Indian batter KL Rahul’s unfair dismissal against Australia in Perth became a controversial talking point during the match. This moment ignited debates among cricket experts and fans about the reliability of the Decision Review System (DRS) and the interpretation of the available technology. The dismissal proved costly for India, as Rahul was looking set to play a crucial knock in challenging conditions.
During the first Test match between India and Australia at Optus Stadium, Perth, KL Rahul had to give his wicket due to a terrible umpiring. In the 23rd over, Mitchell Starc delivered a hard-length delivery outside the off stump. The ball got pitched and deviated, passing close to the bat of Indian opener KL Rahul.
Initially, Rahul was adjudged not out by the on-field umpire when Australian players appealed for a caught-behind. However, Australia opted to review the decision, and the third umpire overturned the call despite the evidence being inconclusive.
The replays showed a slight spike on UltraEdge as the ball passed the bat, but there was a clear gap between the ball and his bat. The third umpire did not check other angles or use additional tools like Hotspot to verify the dismissal and overturned it without any conclusive evidence.
KL Rahul was in fine form, playing a brilliant knock and looking well-set to anchor India’s innings in the challenging Perth conditions. His technique and composure had kept the Australian bowlers at bay, and he seemed primed for a big score. However, the controversial decision left him visibly shocked as the third umpire ruled him out despite the inconclusive evidence.
Disappointed, Rahul had no choice but to walk back to the pavilion, leaving the Indian dressing room in disbelief and the fans frustrated over what many deemed an unfair dismissal. This unfortunate decision triggered widespread anger among fans and the cricketing community. Many took to social media to express their frustration, criticizing the lack of thoroughness in using available technology during the review process.
